Search Results for: common core

Thoughts on ESSA and Centralized Education

11 Dec, 2015 by in common core, education, ESEA, ESSA Leave a comment

Source– Pinterest

I’ve had several people ask me what I think now that ESSA has been signed.

Here are my sentiments …

“It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.” ― James Madison

I am troubled by what passed and what is about to hit classrooms, homes and neighborhoods all across the nation.

” Schools are not factories; education can’t be systematized; learning can’t be centrally planned.

Good teachers are successful not because they’re following some magic formula concocted by “experts” in Washington, but because they do what good teachers everywhere have always done: they work harder than just about anyone, and they know their class material inside and out; they communicate early and often with each students’ parents, so that they, and their students, can be held accountable; they observe and listen to their students, in order to understand their unique learning needs and goals, and tailor each day’s lesson plans accordingly; and they evaluate students honestly and comprehensively, assessing whether they’ve mastered the material, not just figured out how to take a test.” –Senator Mike Lee ( R-Utah)

 

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) issued this statement on the conference report of the Every Student Succeeds Act-S. 1177:

“The Every Student Succeeds Act unfortunately continues to propagate the large and ever-growing role of the federal government in our education system—the same federal government that sold us failed top-down standards like Common Core. We should be empowering parents and local school districts instead of perpetuating the same tired approach that continues to fail our nation’s children. In many ways, the conference report was worse than the original Senate bill—removing the few good provisions from the House bill that would have allowed some Title I portability for low-income students as well as a parental opt-out from onerous federal accountability standards. The American people expect the Republican majority to do better. And our children deserve better, which is why I cannot support this bill.”

 

American Principles Project is disappointed that Congress has passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) to reauthorize the failed No Child Left Behind statute. The claims of Republican leadership that the bill will transfer power back to the states are largely illusory. 

“It is particularly noteworthy and even shocking that so many Republicans voted in favor of this bill. Apparently they did not consider it a red flag that every Democrat in Congress supported it, that Barack Obama supported it, that Arne Duncan supported it, that Nancy Pelosi supported it, and that the owners of the Common Core national standards – National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers – supported it.”

From The Washington Post:

“There are major problems with this legislation; anybody who thinks federal dictates have disappeared are in for a surprise, and anybody who would like to see the federal government exercise its power to fix systemic school funding problems and seriously broaden the scope of reform are in for a letdown, too.”-  The successor to No Child Left Behind has, it turns out, big problems of its own

“President Obama just signed the reform of the ‘No Child Left Behind’ Act, now called the ‘Every Child Succeeds’ Act. It appears to me the federal government still hasn’t learned, especially in the area of education, their role is to ensure equality of opportunity…not equality of outcomes… Just more duplicitous hypocrisy emanating from Obama. We should be reducing the impact of the federal government in the area of education; that is a state and local governance responsibility.”- Allen West

Also Helpful:

Nicholas Tampio: Is ESSA a Hoax?

U.S. Senate Approves No Child Left Behind Replacement

ESSA benefits Goldman Sachs? But hurts SPED kids?

The Complete Restructure of American Education and Why It’s Happening

ESEA-Rewrite Bill Includes Controversial Teacher-Prep Provisions

The disturbing provisions about teacher preparation in No Child Left Behind rewrite

 

A very sincere thank you to those Senators who voted against ESSA:

Senator Rand Paul (KY)
Senator Mike Lee (UT)
Senator Ted Cruz (TX)
Senator Ben Sasse (NE)
Senator Mike Crapo (ID)
Senator David Vitter (LA)
Senator Jerry Moran (KS)
Senator Richard Shelby (AL)
Senator James Risch (ID)
Senator Roy Blunt (MO)
Senator Tim Scott (SC)
Senator Steve Daines (MT)

And to our entire Utah Delegation in the House who also voted NO:

Chris Stewart
Jason Chaffetz
Mia Love
Rob Bishop

 

 

US House Members

Who Voted Nay On Agreeing to the Conference Report
BILL TITLE: To reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to ensure that every child achieves

Amash
Babin
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Brat
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Buck
Chabot
Chaffetz
Clawson (FL)
Culberson
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Duncan (SC)
Farenthold
Fleming
Franks (AZ)
Gohmert
Gosar
Gowdy
Graves (LA)
Guinta
Harper
Harris
Hice, Jody B.
Holding
Huelskamp
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kelly (MS)
King (IA)
Labrador
Lamborn
Loudermilk
Love
Lummis
Marchant
Massie
Meadows
Miller (FL)
Mooney (WV)
Mulvaney
Palazzo
Palmer
Perry
Poe (TX)
Ratcliffe
Rogers (AL)
Rohrabacher
Rothfus
Salmon
Sanford
Schweikert
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Stewart
Stutzman
Walker
Weber (TX)
Wenstrup
Yoder
Yoho

For my book reading friends, some of these titles may be worth a read:

 

Divergent (Divergent Series)
Insurgent (Divergent Series)
Allegiant (Divergent Series)
Matched
Uglies
The Giver (Giver Quartet)
Red Scarf Girl: A Memoir of the Cultural Revolution
1984

Divider

What ESSA Really Says

07 Dec, 2015 by in education, ESEA, ESSA, NCLB, secretary of education 6 comments

Image source: Gifted Education Online Resources

 

What is actually contained in the Every Student Succeeds Act, the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act?
I wanted to know.

So I spent three days straight reading EVERY SINGLE WORD the 1061 page bill which is set to go to the Senate for a vote tomorrow. I ask all congressmen to read the bill, especially the more concerning portions outlined below.

Know what you are voting on is not an end to common core or a return to local control. It is an expansion of “the secretary’s” duties and Federal control. The new ESEA is an expansion of K-12 education mandates. It sets up “college and career ready” preschoolers and encourages SLDS tracking by numerous governmental agencies into the post secondary education years.

ESSA outlines data collection, competency based pay for teachers, pipeline services from birth to age 20, new federally monitored “promise” neighborhoods, an expansion of data driven computer adaptive testing, and in-school mental health services which will not be protected by HIPPA privacy protection laws.  It is an erosion of local control and the continuation of a data driven model which corporate interests will benefit from.

Do me a favor, count how many times you read the words “the secretary.”

 

READ THE BILL here

 

P.46

‘‘(7) FAILURE TO MEET REQUIREMENTS.—If a 21 State fails to meet any of the requirements of this section, the Secretary may withhold funds for State administration under this part until the Secretary determines that the State has fulfilled those requirements.

P120

‘‘(viii) Information submitted by the State educational agency and each local educational agency in the State, in accordance with data collection conducted pursu- ant to section 203(c)(1) of the Department of Education Organization Act (20 U.S.C. 3413(c)(1)), on—

‘‘(I) measures of school quality, climate, and safety, including rates of in-school suspensions, out-of-school suspensions, expulsions, school-related arrests, referrals to law enforcement, chronic absenteeism (including both excused and unexcused absences), incidences of violence, including bullying and harassment; and

P.85 .Data Tracking of any indicators

‘‘(II) For purposes of subclause (I),the State may include measures of— ‘‘(III) student engagement;‘‘(IV) educator engagement;‘‘(V) student access to and completion of advanced coursework;‘‘(VI) postsecondary readiness;‘‘(VII) school climate and safety; and‘‘(VIII) ANY OTHER INDICATOR the State chooses that meets the requirements of this clause

Does the Government also intend to regulate private schools? See pages 186-187, 833-840

11 SEC. 1011. PARTICIPATION OF CHILDREN ENROLLED IN
12 PRIVATE SCHOOLS.
13 Section 1117, as redesignated by section 1000(3), is
14 amended—
15 (1) in subsection (a)—
16 (A) by striking paragraph (1) and insert-
17 ing the following:
18 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—To the extent consistent
19 with the number of eligible children identified under
20 section 1115(c) in the school district served by a
21 local educational agency who are enrolled in private
22 elementary schools and secondary schools, a local
23 educational agency shall—
24 ‘‘(A) after timely and meaningful consulta-
25 tion with appropriate private school officials,
1 provide such children, on an equitable basis and
2 individually or in combination, as requested by
3 the officials to best meet the needs of such chil-
4 dren, special educational services, instructional
5 services (including evaluations to determine the
6 progress being made in meeting such students’
7 academic needs), counseling, mentoring, one-on-
8 one tutoring, or other benefits under this part
9 (such as dual or concurrent enrollment, edu-
10 cational radio and television, computer equip-
11 ment and materials, other technology, and mo-
12 bile educational services and equipment) that
13 address their needs; and
14 ‘‘(B) ensure that teachers and families of
15 the children participate, on an equitable basis,
16 in services and activities developed pursuant to
17 section 1116.’’;
18 (B) by striking paragraph (3) and insert-
19 ing the following:
20 ‘‘(3) EQUITY.—
21 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Educational services
22 and other benefits for such private school chil-
23 dren shall be equitable in comparison to serv-
24 ices and other benefits for public school chil
1 dren participating under this part, and shall be
2 provided in a timely manner.
3 ‘‘(B) OMBUDSMAN.—To help ensure such
4 equity for such private school children, teach-
5 ers, and other educational personnel, the State
6 educational agency involved shall designate an
7 ombudsman to monitor and enforce the require-
8 ments of this part.’’;

Palau?

P.198

(b) ASSISTANCE TO OUTLYING AREAS.—5 ‘‘(1) FUNDS RESERVED.—From the amount made available for any fiscal year under subsection7 (a)(1), the Secretary shall—8 ‘‘(A) first reserve $1,000,000 for the Republic of Palau, until Palau enters into an agreement for extension of United States educational assistance under the Compact of FreeAssociation, and subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary may establish, except that Public Law 95–134, permitting the consolidation of grants, shall not apply;

 

 

States are gathering data and reporting to “the Secretary”

P232

‘(ix) gather data, solicit regular feedback from teachers, principals, other school leaders, and parents, and assess the results of each year of the program of demonstration authority under this section, and respond by making needed changes to the innovative assessment system; and

‘‘(x) report data from the innovative assessment system annually to the Secretary, including—

19 ‘‘(i) a description of the local educational agencies within the State educational agency that will participate, including what criteria the State has for approving any additional local educational agencies to participate during the demonstration authority period;

 

p289

  1. ‘‘(h) NONCOMPLIANCE.—The Secretary may, after

  2. 15  providing notice and an opportunity for a hearing (includ-
  3. 16  ing the opportunity to provide supporting evidence as pro-
  4. 17  vided for in subsection (i)), terminate a local flexibility
  5. 18  demonstration agreement under this section if there is evi-
  6. 19  dence that the local educational agency has failed to com-
  7. 20  ply with the terms of the agreement and the requirements
  8. 21  under subsections (d) and (e).

P337

Incentivized teaching

to improve within-district equity in the distribution of teachers, consistent with sec- tion 1111(g)(1)(B), such as initiatives that pro- vide—

‘‘(i) expert help in screening can- didates and enabling early hiring;

‘‘(ii) differential and incentive pay for teachers, principals, or other school leaders in high-need academic subject areas and specialty areas, which may include per- formance-based pay systems;

‘‘(iii) teacher, paraprofessional, prin- cipal, or other school leader advancement and professional growth, and an emphasis on leadership opportunities, multiple career paths, and pay differentiation

P348 Human capital

  1. (2) to study and review performance-based
  2. 9  compensation systems or human capital manage-
  3. 10  ment systems for teachers, principals, or other
  4. 11  school leaders to evaluate the effectiveness, fairness,
  5. 12  quality, consistency, and reliability of the systems

3) HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.— The term ‘human capital management system’ means a system—
‘‘(A) by which a local educational agency makes and implements human capital decisions, such as decisions on preparation, recruitment, hiring, placement, retention, dismissal, compensation, professional development, tenure, and promotion; and
‘‘(B) that includes a performance-based compensation system.
‘‘(4) PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION SYSTEM.—The term ‘performance-based compensation system’ means a system of compensation for teachers, principals, or other school leaders”

Are our students Human Capital or are they children?

 

Teachers and Administrators See pages p350-359!

p351

1 ‘‘SEC. 2212. TEACHER AND SCHOOL LEADER INCENTIVE 2 FUND GRANTS. 3 ‘‘(a) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.—From the amounts reserved by the Secretary under section 2201(1), the Secretary shall award grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities to enable the eligible entities to develop, implement, improve, or expand performance-based compensation systems or human capital management systems, in schools served by the eligible entity.

 

P404
‘‘(B) use evidence-based screening assessments for early identification of such students beginning not later than kindergarten;

 

P 453

23 ‘‘(6) SCHOOL-BASED MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES PROVIDER.—The term ‘school-based mental 25 health services provider’ includes a State-licensed or State-certified school counselor, school psychologist, school social worker, or other State licensed or certified mental health professional qualified underState law to provide mental health services to children and adolescents

see also p 479

Pages 599-618 are in my opinion the scariest section of the bill. They prescribe expanded learning time, pipeline services, full-service community schools, neighborhoods of promise and ‘‘(B) A needs assessment that identifies the academic, physical, nonacademic, health, mental health, and other needs of students, families, and community residents. This is federal intrusion into the home, the neighborhood and the health records of students.

Also see p 617.

 

Pgs 599-608
Expanded learning time

‘‘(ii) ensuring appropriate diagnostic assessments and referrals for children with disabilities and children aged 3 through 9 experiencing developmental delays, consistent with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), where applicable.

‘‘(B) Supporting, enhancing, operating, or expanding rigorous, comprehensive, effective educational improvements, which may include high-quality academic programs, expanded learning time, and programs and activities to prepare students for postsecondary education admissions and success.

 

P617

Needs assessment for pipeline services

‘‘(B) A needs assessment that identifies

the academic, physical, nonacademic, health, mental health, and other needs of students, families, and community residents

 

13 ‘‘(22) EXPANDED LEARNING TIME.—The term

14 ‘expanded learning time’ means using a longer

15 school day, week, or year schedule to significantly

16 increase the total number of school hours, in order

17 to include additional time for—‘‘(A) activities and instruction for enrichment as part of a well-rounded education; and ‘‘(B) instructional and support staff to collaborate, plan, and engage in professional development (including professional development on family and community engagement) within and

across grades and subjects. P 783

 

Cohorts?

Starting on Page 784 line 12

Data must be collected annually by State educational agencies for submission to the National Center for Education Statistics under section 153 of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (20 U.S.C. 9543),

p. 793
PROGRAMS NOT PROVIDING CREDIT.—Except as provided in subparagraph (A)(ii)(I)(bb), a student who is retained in grade or who is enrolled in a program leading to a general equivalency diploma, or other alternative educational program that does not issue or provide credit toward the issuance of a regular high school diploma, shall not be considered transferred out and shall remain in the adjusted cohort.

page 914

SEC. 9206. POSTHUMOUS PARDON.14 (a) FINDINGS.

—Congress finds the following:15 (1) John Arthur ‘‘Jack’’ Johnson was a flamboyant, defiant, and controversial figure in the history of the United States who challenged racial biases.19 (2) Jack Johnson was born in Galveston, Texas, in 1878 to parents who were former slaves.21 (3) Jack Johnson became a professional boxer and traveled throughout the United States, fighting White and African-American heavyweights.24 (4) After being denied (on purely racial grounds) the opportunity to fight…

It goes on until page 918

Why is a posthumous pardon of a boxer in an education bill?

Why do we need 1061 pages of bill released two days before the House vote to repeal No Child Left Behind? Let teachers teach. Let local LEA’s govern their own schools. Let parents be the primary entity in charge of their child’s education. The family is the central unit of our society. Not the school. Not the federal government.

This is just the tip of the iceburg.

Dig in and read ESSA for yourself.

Tell me what you think after 50 pages.

 

Call the U.S. Senate switchboard today at (202) 224-3121.

Contact your Senators and ask them to

Vote NO on ESSA.

Read and watch more:

Letter to Congress and Compiled Notes from Alyson Williams and 50 Citizen Readers on ESEA “Every Student Succeeds Act

State Senator Blasts ESEA: Use His Letter to Reach Your Own Legislators

#ESEA – The New Common Core- Psychological Profiling of American Students

NCLB 2002 VS. ESSA 2015

Open Message to California Senators – Save us from the New ESEA

Weekend News: ESSA’s ‘Untold’ Ties to HEA

 

Divider

Speaking Out For Parental Rights in Utah- Opt Out of SAGE

17 Apr, 2015 by in AIR, opt out, parental rights, SAGE, testing, utah education Leave a comment

locally_directed_ed

Photo credit Wendell Ashby

Last night Christel Swasey and I had the wonderful opportunity to meet with members of the community as part of a Locally Directed Education meeting.

We shared our concerns about computerized adaptive testing in Utah and data collection. As promised, here are some helpful links and articles about AIR (the company behind SAGE), parental rights code, and the opt out policy being proposed by the Utah State Office of Education.

Who Is Behind the SAGE Portal and Test?

 

AIR-logo (1)

AIR- American Institutes of Research

About  (from their website) AIR is one of the world’s largest behavioral and social science research and evaluation organizations.

Mission: AIR’s mission is to conduct and apply the best behavioral and social science research and evaluation towards improving peoples’ lives, with a special emphasis on the disadvantaged.

Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research Program
Analyzing state longitudinal data that allows us to follow individuals from kindergarten through elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education and into the labor market, ALDER examines how education policies affect outcomes for students and teachers. We evaluate real policies in practice and answer the perennial question asked by educators, policymakers, and the public:

“AIR uses a single student data management system for the summative, interim and formative systems. This management system, TIDE, will be populated with LEA student data beginning in August, 2013.” source: USOE

USOE State Longitudinal Data System

This is much bigger than Utah, the data sharing will be International

International

“AIR’s international work improves the quality of life in developing countries by using rigorous research and evaluation to enhance education and social development. With a wide variety of local partners and multinational organizations, we develop, pilot and implement field-based international development activities in lower- and middle-income countries. We provide governments and international aid agencies with the educational assessment tools and expertise they need to measure progress in student achievement and school effectiveness. Our international work is conducted by AIR’s International Development, Evaluation and Research program, as well as our Education and Health and Social Development programs.”

AIR is behind Florida’s tests as well, which our Utah students field tested items for.

Guess where Florida is field testing its new standardized tests? (Not Florida) The Washington Post

Utah Does Not Love Test It Sold To Florida Posted by Peter Greene at Friday, February 20, 2015

 

Even scarier than summative and interim tests is stealth assessment and daily formative assessment. Coming soon to Utah unless we speak up. 

Utah’s Poulson-Osmond Resolution opens the gate for stealth assessments

 

What is Florida doing?

TALLAHASSEE — “Gov. Rick Scott on Tuesday signed a wide-ranging bill aimed at rolling back the number of tests given to public school students.  The legislation (HB 7069) was the most closely-watched education bill of the 2015 session.It puts a hold on the use of student test data for school grades, teacher evaluations and student promotion to fourth grade until the new Florida Standards Assessments can be independently validated. It also scraps a law requiring school districts to come up with end-of-course tests in classes where the state doesn’t administer such exams; caps the amount of time students can spend on state and school district tests at 45 hours a year; and reduces the portion of a teacher’s evaluation tied to student performance from the current 50 percent to one-third.”- source: BRANDON LARRABEE, The News Service of Florida 12:45 p.m. CDT April 15, 2015

What Is Montana Doing? 

“The decision this week by the head of Montana schools to allow school districts to opt out of glitch-prone Smarter Balanced exams has thrown Montana into the center of a national debate over standardized testing. …Glitches and crashes in the online tests that have affected Montana schools were beyond the state’s control, education officials have said. The SBAC testing system being used in Montana and two other states is built on an open-source version of the proprietary testing platform developed by the American Institutes for Research. 16 hours ago • DEREK BROUWER Billings Gazette

What is New York doing about testing?

155,000 New York kids boycott standardized tests

“MAHOPAC, N.Y. — Tens of thousands of parents expressed disapproval of New York’s reliance on standardized tests by having their children refuse to take the tests earlier this week.

Several districts in the New York City suburbs reported that at least 25% of students had refused to take the tests. In at least two, that number rose to 50%.

Mahopac Central School District’s interim superintendent, Brian Monahan, said 55% of his system’s middle school students and 45% of the elementary school students had refused the tests. At North Rockland Central School District in Garnerville, N.Y, 63% of middle school students refused the tests with the overall district refusal rate at 49%.” source: Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy, The (Westchester County, N.Y.) Journal News 9:31 p.m. EDT April 16, 2015

Utah Opt Out Memos Whittle Rights

THE EVOLUTION OF UTAH’S SAGE OPT OUT MEMO- PARSING PARENTAL RIGHTS

February 2nd Utah Opt Out Memo

State Superintendent Brad Smith in response to the Feb. 2, 2015 memo

Parents may opt out of testing in Utah according to Superintendent Smith. “The most important legal policy….by constitution, and by what I consider to be natural rights, parents have the right to opt out of anything! They don’t need permission. They don’t need to fill out a form. They don’t need to seek someone else’s response. And, that’s an inherent and integral right of parents.”..“Sage is one of the tests in all of its components that was unambiguously covered by the safe harbor provisions of Section1403 9a. And so that is one that unambiguously there is an opt out provision….But if there’s a question about SAGE, I believe there is unanimity and no ambiguity that SAGE is absolutely something that is subject to..the safe harbor provisions of 1403-9a.”

New Opt Out Policy

“In its April 10, 2015 meeting, the Utah State Board of Education:

-Released the draft grades 6-8 Science Standards for 90-day public review

-Approved an update to the opt-out rule for statewide assessments” source: USOE website

Please review send your comments to the Utah State Board of Education members

Board@schools.utah.gov

New Utah Board of Education Opt Out Policy
R277. Education, Administration.
R277-404. Requirements for Assessments of Student Achievement

Some notable excerpts with changes marked in red:
M. “State administered assessment[s]” means a formative, interim,
summative SAGE, Utah alternate assessment, benchmark reading assessment,
EXPLORE, PLAN [and]or the ACT.

R277-404-6. Student and Parent Participation in Student Assessments in Public Schools; Parental Exclusion from Testing and Safe Harbor Provisions. A. Parents are primarily responsible for their children’s education and have the constitutional right to determine which aspects of public education, including assessment systems, in which their children participate.[ Parental rights may be exercised without notice or permission.] Parents may further exercise their inherent rights to exempt their children from [certain]a state administered assessment[s] without further consequence by an LEA. [A]B. [All ]LEAs shall administer [the comprehensive]state administered assessments [system ]to all students unless: (1) the Utah alternat[ive]e assessment is approved for specific students consistent with federal law and as specified in a student’s IEP; or (2) [unless ]students are excused by a parent or guardian under Section 53A-15-1403(9) and as provided in this rule. C. A parent may exercise the right to exempt their child from a[ny] state administered assessment[ mandated by the Board or state statute]. Upon exercising the right to exempt a child from a state[-mandated] administered assessment under this provision, an LEA [shall]may not impose an[y] adverse consequence on a child as a result of the exercise of rights under this provision. In order to exercise the right to exempt a child from a state[-mandated testing] administered assessment under this provision and insure the protections of this 7 rovision, a parent shall annually complete [a written]the Board approved parent excuse form[ (on a form to be approved by the USOE),] a minimum of [five (5)]one (1) day[s] prior to the administration of the state administered assessment and provide the form to the responsible [LEA]school. D. School grading, teacher evaluations, and student progress reports or grades [will]may not be negatively impacted by students excused from taking a state administered assessment[s]. E. Any assessment not mandated by the Board as defined in R277-404-2M[ or state-statute], the administration of such assessments, and the consequence of taking or failing to take such assessments shall be governed by policies to be adopted by each LEA. [B]F. [An LEA educator]LEAs shall provide a student’s individual test results and scores to the student’s parent[/legal] or guardian[ consistent with FERPA] upon request and consistent with the protection of student privacy. G. An LEA may not reward a student for taking a state administered assessment.

Current Utah Parental Rights in Education Code

S.B. 122 Second Substitute Parental Rights in Public Education

S.B. 204 Second Substitute Parental Rights in Public Education Amendments

Signed and will enroll summer 2015  

216          (9) (a) At the request of a student’s parent or guardian, an LEA shall excuse a student
217     from taking an assessment that:
218          (i) is federally mandated;
219          (ii) is mandated by the state under this title; or
220          (iii) requires the use of:
221          (A) a state assessment system; or
222          (B) software that is provided or paid for by the state.
223          (b) In accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, the
224     State Board of Education shall make rules:
225          (i) to establish a statewide procedure for excusing a student under Subsection (9)(a)
226     that:
227          (A) does not place an undue burden on a parent or guardian; and
228          (B) may be completed online; and
229          (ii) to prevent negative impact, to the extent authorized by state statute, to an LEA or
230     an LEA’s employees through school grading or employee evaluations due to a student not
231     taking a test under Subsection (9)(a).
232          (c) An LEA:
233          (i) shall follow the procedures outlined in rules made by the State Board of Education
234     under Subsection (9)(b) to excuse a student under Subsection (9)(a);
235          (ii) may not require procedures to excuse a student under Subsection (9)(a) in addition
236     to the procedures outlined in rules made by the State Board of Education under Subsection
237     (9)(b); and
238          (iii) may not reward a student for taking an assessment described in Subsection (9)(a).
239          (d) The State Board of Education shall:
240          (i) maintain and publish a list of state assessments, state assessment systems, and
241     software that qualify under Subsection (9)(a); and
242          (ii) audit and verify an LEA’s compliance with the requirements of this Subsection (9).
243          (10) (a) An LEA shall provide for:
244          (i) the distribution of a copy of a school’s discipline and conduct policy to each student
245     in accordance with Section 53A-11-903; and
246          (ii) a parent’s or guardian’s signature acknowledging receipt of the school’s discipline
247     and conduct policy.
248          (b) An LEA shall notify a parent or guardian of a student’s violation of a school’s
249     discipline and conduct policy and allow a parent or guardian to respond to the notice in
250     accordance with Chapter 11, Part 9, School Discipline and Conduct Plans.

Education Committee Meeting Notes

MINUTES OF THE HO– USE EDUCATION STANDING COMMITTEE February 17, 2015

MINUTES OF THE HO– USE EDUCATION STANDING COMMITTEE February 9, 2015

MINUTES OF THE HO– USE EDUCATION STANDING COMMITTEE February 26, 2015

Related Media Links

A Utah judge closed the State School Board ballot once and for all Friday, denying three candidates’ efforts to renew their candidacy. U.S. District Court Judge Clark Waddoups rejected Davis County resident Heather Gardner’s request that she and 40

Decision process for State School Board leaves many out The Davis Clipper

Utah School Violates Law, Forces Students to Take Exams Against Parent’s Wishes Libertas Institute

Assistant Attorney General Further Restricts Parental Rights in Utah Libertas Institute

Opting out of tests UACC-Oak Norton

Education News Roundup: Feb. 9, 2015

Confusion abounds on Utah school test opt-out rules Ogden Standard Examiner

Bill clarifies law allowing parents to opt children out of school testing Deseret News

Opting Kids Out of Testing is a Battle!  Kate Dalley Show

Kate And Thomas Visit With Heather Gardner On Common Core audio

SB204: Making More Explicit a Parent’s Right to Opt a Child out of Testing Libertas Institute

Utah Mother Defends Parental Rights

Heather Gardner Interview: Parental Rights in Education  Kate Dalley Show

 

HB342: Amendments to State School Board Election Process UEA Report on the 2015 Utah Legislature General Session

Lawmakers narrow selection of school board election bills Deseret News

Committee OKs $13.5M bill for teacher salary increases Deseret News

Committee approves bill clarifying parents’ right to opt students out of testing Salt Lake Tribune

Educators meet with state leaders, offer evaluation of Common Core standards Fox 13 News

Lawmakers, educators consider consequences of opting children out of testing KSL

Locally Directed Education group talks SAGE

Concerned mothers speak to public about SAGE

 

Supreme Court Cases that Uphold Parental Rights

It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder. . . . It is in recognition of this that these decisions have respected the private realm of family life which the state cannot enter. – Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944)

The history and culture of Western civilization reflect a strong tradition of parental concern for the nurture and upbringing of their children. This primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition. -(Yoder, 1972)

 

Read  and Watch More

U.S. Supreme Court: Parents’ Rights Are Fundamental Ocean Network.org

The Supreme Court’s Parental Rights Doctrine ParentalRights.Org

Parents Against the Common Core videos

What are my parental rights? by Morgan Olsen

Dr. Gary Thompson Common Core Presentation Idaho Falls November 2014

Data Mining In Common Core – TheBlazeTV – The Glenn Beck Program

Big Ocean Women

Letter to Obama signed by numerous authors including Maya Angelou

 

Upcoming Events

11011467_683400175099678_5518615319101383320_n (1)

UACC Symposium – Empowering Parents – May 13

“Come join Joy Pullmann from the Federalist (and formerly of the Heritage Foundation), Rod Arquette, Senator Al Jackson and his wife Juleen, and many others speaking on empowering parents. Also, come to a special showing of Tim Ballard’s documentary, The Abolitionist.”

I will be teaching a workshop…

MORNING IN-DEPTH PARENT WORKSHOPS 

9:00-12:00

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
9:00-10:00 Common Core 101 –
Jenny Baker
The Next Frontiers: Data Collection from Birth to Death—
Joy Pullman
Principles of the Constitution-
Stacey Thornton
Laureen Simper
10:00-11:00 DATA-
Big Ocean Women
The Difference between Progressive and Effective Education –
Joy Pullman
Parental Rights-
Heather Gardner
11:00-12:00 Will national Science standards be coming to Utah?
Vince Newmeyer
SAGE Testing- Should I Opt-Out?
Wendy Hart
Getting Involved & Making a Difference- Jared Carmen

 

Cost to Participants- $5.00 to attend all of the workshops

9:00-12:00 UVU Classrooms in the Sorensen Student Center

Action

Sign the Return to Parental Rights Proclamation

-Opt out or refuse the tests

-Do not sign into the SAGE practice portal or participate in SAGE formative assignments, interim or summative assessments

-Learn about stealth assessment

-Attend your local and State School Board meetings

-Elect officials based on their bill voting records. Follow education legislation

– Attend interim and in session education committee meetings on Capitol Hill

-Remember that your parental rights and your students’ rights are inherent.

Learn about them, uphold them, use them.

Defend Liberty. Defend the family.

Divider

When A State Forces A Child- Why You Should Opt Out of Testing

08 Feb, 2015 by in Uncategorized Leave a comment

opt-out5

Many of you may have noticed my posts have been a bit more sporadic lately. This week has been CRAZY. All of those things they tell you happen in politics, DO in fact, happen in politics.

 

Here’s a recap of what my family has been through this week:

Assistant Attorney General Further Restricts Parental Rights in Utah

School Violates Law, Forces Students to Take Exams Against Parent’s Wishes

Opting Out of State Tests

* Confusion abounds on Utah school test opt-out rules

 

Here is my public response, given in two minutes… since that is all they gave me at the Utah Board of Education Meeting. You can view it here. Or listen to the meeting here.

 

My name is Heather Gardner
I am the mother of five children.
I am the daughter of a teacher who taught for 24 years up until that day she died.
I was a former State School Board candidate, however, the nominating committee and Judge Waddoups did not choose to place me on the ballot.
And, I am also the mother of a child, who last week was forced to take an assessment, the DIBELS at her school.
Many of you–in fact, all of you, should have received an email in your inbox this week. If you have not seen that email, I am happy top re-forward you that email to you, which tells the story of what we have been going through the past two years advocating for parents’ rights in our school and the right to opt out of statewide assessments, not state administered assessments.
I have had three of my children forced to take an alternate exam on SAGE testing day and we have been pressured by our local school, our executive charter board, and ultimately, our state to surrender our parental rights.
I am the mother of multiple children who did not reach benchmark on DIBELS, or national and state proficiency levels on end of year testing. However, I was never notified by my school, that they did not meet that.
I am the mother of a kindergartner who went through seven hours of neuro psychological evaluation and assessment by the school, and had data on my side, yet no services were offered to my son.
I am a mother who has gone through injections with my children, occupational therapy, genetic counseling, CT scans, and due process.

I AM A MOTHER, I AM NOT A STAKEHOLDER

and I will not let my children’s future be at stake because an Assistant Attorney General or an assessment director tells my school they need to force my child to take a test.
My child went on her last day of school to say goodbye to her teachers and friends, and was singled out and pulled out, and was forced to take a test, directly against parental opt out.
I would ask that you consider parental rights today and not stand idly by, but vote that the opt out memo that was issued this week be amended.
Please vote on this.
Give the rights back to the parents.
Under both the United States Constitution and the constitution of this state, a parent possesses a fundamental liberty, interest in the care , custody and management of the parents’ children.

Does this make you upset?

Are you as concerned as I am?

If so, here’s what you can do:

1) Opt out or refuse statewide and common core related assessments. In my state you have the legal right to do so under SB122

2) Share the media articles above or comment directly on them

3) Learn your rights and exercise them. Not sure what they are? Look here

4) If you are in Utah, email any of the following:

 

Mainstream media contacts

Your House Representative

Your Senator

Senator Aaron Osmond

Utah Board of Education

Superintendent Brad Smith

Utah State Office of Education Assessment

Judy Park at USOE

AAG Chris Lacombe

AG Sean Reyes

Legacy Preparatory Academy

Executive Board at LPA

Your local school

Your local and district school board

 

5) If you have had similar experiences or have input on how to prevent this from happening again, share it on this form.

6) Support a new parental rights bill in Utah and Aaron Osmond’s bill which should be introduced in 2015 session to amend SB122. Email him and ask him to expedite SB204.

7) Come to the Utah State Board of Education Meeting Friday March 6, 2015 at 8 AM. 250 S. 500 E. Salt Lake City, Utah. Wear a green shirt. Ask the board NOT to renew our ESEA waiver in March.

8) Speak up to defend teachers, children and parents.

9) Learn about the SAGE formative, interim, and summative tests administered by AIR, statewide longitudinal data system (SLDS) and data collection on our children. Google it, you may be surprised.

10) Follow this years’ legislation that relates to education. Read the bills, track them and testify in committee if you have a strong opinion. Discuss your wishes with your representative or senator.

11) Ask your local school and board to introduce a new parental rights, opt out and student privacy policy. Write one yourself. I did.

You must be the change you wish to see in the world- Mahatma Gandhi

 

 

The Immortals by Steven T. Collis

20 May, 2021 by in Uncategorized 2 comments


ACCLAIMED AUTHOR & LEGAL SCHOLAR STEVEN T. COLLIS TO RELEASE NEW WORK – THE IMMORTALS
-The Immortals tells an incredible, true story of heroism and sacrifice at the height of WWII-

SALT LAKE CITY – The inspiration behind Steven T. Collis’s new book, The Immortals, came from a small and simple thing: a three-cent postage stamp from the 1940s depicting four chaplains, a sinking ship, and the words “These Immortal Chaplains…Interfaith in Action.”

Intrigued, Collis learned the stamp was created to honor four military chaplains of different faiths — Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish — who made the ultimate sacrifice when a German U-boat attacked the SS Dorchester in February 1943. But during his research into what was one of the costliest troop disasters of WWII, Collis discovered another, often unrecognized, hero of the tragedy — Coast Guardsman Charles W. David, Jr.

“Charles W. David, Jr. was a young steward’s mate and one of the only Black Coast Guardsmen aboard the Coast Guard cutter Comanche,” says Collis. “While the Dorchester was sinking, David repeatedly dove into the frigid waters of the North Atlantic and single-handedly saved scores of sailors and soldiers. Sadly, his heroic efforts ultimately cost him his life, as he succumbed to pneumonia shortly after.”

Thoroughly researched and exquisitely narrated, The Immortals presents the story through dual points of view: the chaplains’ and David’s stories and the German U-boat captain’s. The U-boat commander and his crew kept meticulous journals and logs, allowing readers to experience a perspective not often seen in WWII histories.

Beyond conducting research through US and German military records and press reports, Collis was able to get detailed accounts of the event and its impact by interviewing actual survivors of the Dorchester as well as from descendants of Charles W. David, Jr., other survivors, and the chaplains. “The impact of these five men and their selfless acts of courage cannot be overstated,” Collis remarks. “Their sacrifices in the name of unity and service should be a shining example to all of us today – no matter our differences.”

The Immortals: The World War II Story of Five Fearless Heroes, the Sinking of the Dorchester, and an Awe-Inspiring Rescue will be available nationwide on May 11, 2021, wherever books are sold. For more information on Steven T. Collis and his works, visit: www.shadowmountain.com.

Hardcover, 288 pages

Purchase

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Steven T. Collis is the author of the nonfiction books Deep Conviction and The Immortals and the novel At Any Cost. He is a storyteller at heart, but in his other life, he is also a law professor at the University of Texas School of Law, where he is the faculty director of the Bech-Loughlin First Amendment Center and Texas’s Law & Religion Clinic.

Prior to joining the faculty at Texas, he was the Olin-Darling Research Fellow in the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School and was an equity partner at Holland & Hart LLP, where he chaired the firm’s nationwide religious institutions and First Amendment practice group.

​Before embarking on his legal and writing career, Steven graduated magna cum laude from the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to the Order of the Coif and served as an editor on the Michigan Law Review and the Michigan Journal of Race and Law. Steven also holds an M.F.A. in creative writing from Virginia Commonwealth University, where he served as the associate editor of the literary journal Blackbird. He completed his undergraduate studies, with university honors, at Brigham Young University.

Originally from New Mexico, Steven lives in Austin with his wife and children. He is on the web at www.steventcollis.com.

Virtual Book Launch Details:
Join Steven T. Collis, author of THE IMMORTALS, and Bill Kaemmer, Exec. Dir. of the Four Chaplains Memorial Foundation, as well as descendants from The Dorchester, for a special event.

Everyone who signs up will receive a free bookplate signed by Steven T. Collis, and there will be giveaways during the launch party.

Eventbrite Link:https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-immortals-virtual-book-launch-event-with-steven-t-collis-tickets-154343364157

Book Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qP5L9oxdSM

FB Event Link: https://www.facebook.com/events/128912332538454

Publisher Page:https://shadowmountain.com/immortals/

Parents’ and Students’ Rights under IDEA, State Code, FERPA, COPPA

10 Dec, 2014 by in COPPA, FERPA, parents rights, utah law 1 comment

I am deviating from today’s book blog post to take about something very important to me. Parental rights in education. The following is a list I’ve gathered from numerous sources of the Utah, Federal and Constitutional laws that protect parents’ and students’ rights. It has become increasingly important for parents, students, teachers and administrators, as well as board members to know these laws and uphold them.

Please read your local school and district policies. Also, when a child is using a portal, app, program or website at school do you know what they are using? Have you read the terms of service and privacy policies?

This is by no means and exhaustive list, it is just what I have found most recently. Let me know in the comments below  of  other rights written into our laws to add to this list.

Parents’ Rights

FERPA

FERPA provides that an LEA that receives Department funds may not have a policy or practice of denying parents the right to:
-Inspect and review education records within 45 days of a request (34 CFR § 99.10);
-Seek to amend education records believed to be inaccurate (34 CFR §§ 99.20, 99.21, and 99.22); and
– Consent to the disclosure of personally identifiable information from education records except as specified by law (34 CFR §§ 99.30 and 99.31).

Annual Notice
LEAs must annually notify parents and eligible students of their rights under FERPA. 34 CFR§ 99.7. A model FERPA notification for LEAs is enclosed and is also available on FPCO’s Website – http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/lea-officials.html.

The annual notification must include:
– The procedure to inspect and review education records;
– The procedure to request amendment of education records;
– A specification of criteria for determining who constitutes a school official and what constitutes a legitimate educational interest if the educational agency or institution discloses or intends to disclose personally identifiable information to school officials without consent; and
– The right of parents to file a complaint with the FPCO in the Department.
In addition, LEAs may want to include with their annual notification of rights under FERPA their directory information public notices, as discussed below.

Sample records request letter 

Directory Information

If the LEA or educational institution under the LEA chooses to designate directory information, which can be disclosed from education records without consent, it is required by 34 CFR § 99.37 to notify parents and eligible students concerning its use of directory information. A model “directory information” notice is enclosed and is also available on FPCO’s Web site – www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco.

The notice must notify parents and eligible students of:
-The types of information the LEA (or institution) has designated as directory information (see 34 CFR § 99.3 “Directory information” for definition); and,
-The right to opt out of disclosure of directory information.

Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA)

Surveys
Statute: 20 U.S.C. § 1232h. Regulations: 34 CFR Part 98.
PPRA applies to the programs and activities of an SEA, LEA, or other recipient of funds under any program funded by the U.S. Department of Education. It governs the administration to students of a survey, analysis, or evaluation that concerns one or more of the following eight protected areas:
1. political affiliations or beliefs of the student or the student’s parent;
2. mental or psychological problems of the student or the student’s family;
3. sex behavior or attitudes;
4. illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating, or demeaning behavior;
5. critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships;
6. legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and ministers;
7. religious practices, affiliations, or beliefs of the student or student’s parent; or
8. income (other than that required by law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving financial assistance under such program).

For surveys that contain questions from one or more of the eight protected areas that are not funded in whole or in part with Department funds, LEAs must notify a parent at least annually, at the beginning of the school year, of the specific or approximate date(s) of the survey and provide the parent with an opportunity to opt his or her child out of participating. LEAs must also notify parents that they have the right to review, upon request, any instructional materials used in connection with any survey that concerns one or more of the eight protected areas and those used as part of the educational curriculum. (A model PPRA general notification for use by LEAs is enclosed and may also be obtained on FPCO’s website at: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/hottopics/index.html.)

PPRA requires LEAs to work with parents to develop and adopt policies on the following items, unless the LEA or SEA had established comparable policies on or before January 8, 2002:
-The right of parents to inspect, upon request, a survey created by a third party before the survey is administered or distributed by a school to students and the procedure for granting a request by a parent for such access;
-Arrangements to protect student privacy that are provided by the LEA in the event of the administration of a survey to students containing one or more of the eight protected items of information noted above (including the right of parents to inspect, upon request, a survey that concerns one or more of the eight protected items of information);
-The right of parents to inspect, upon request, any instructional material used as part of the educational curriculum for students, and the procedure for granting a request by a parent for such access;
-Administration of physical exams or screenings of students;
-The collection, disclosure, or use of personal information (including items such as a student’s or parent’s first and last name, address, telephone number or social security number) collected from students for marketing purposes, or to sell or otherwise provide the information to others for marketing purposes, including the LEA’s arrangements for protecting student privacy in the event of collection, disclosure, or use of information for these purposes; and
-The right of parents to inspect, upon request, any instrument used in the collection of personal information for marketing or sales purposes before the instrument is administered or distributed to a student and the LEA’s procedure for granting a parent’s request for such access

LEAs must notify parents of their rights under PPRA and of these policies at least annually at the beginning of the school year.

Source http://familypolicy.ed.gov/content/ppra-requirements

Source discussing FERPA, COPPA and PPA – Student Privacy Matters http://www.studentprivacymatters.org/?page_id=317

United States Code

Source: What Are My Parental Rights? Published January 24, 2013, By Morgan Olsen

(c) Surveys or data-gathering activities; regulations
Not later than 240 days after October 20, 1994, the Secretary shall adopt appropriate regulations or procedures, or identify existing regulations or procedures, which protect the rights of privacy of students and their families in connection with any surveys or data-gathering activities conducted, assisted, or authorized by the Secretary or an administrative head of an education agency. Regulations established under this subsection shall include provisions controlling the use, dissemination, and protection of such data. No survey or data-gathering activities shall be conducted by the Secretary, or an administrative head of an education agency under an applicable program, unless such activities are authorized by law.
– Activities involving the collection, disclosure, or use of personal information collected from students for marketing purposes, or to sell or otherwise provide the information to others for marketing purposes; and
– Any non-emergency, invasive physical examination or screening that is 1) required as a condition of attendance; 2) administered by the school and scheduled by the school in advance; and 3) not necessary to protect the immediate health and safety of the student, or of other students. This law does not apply to any physical examination or screening that is permitted or required by State law, including physical examinations or screenings permitted without parental notification.
Right to review Curriculum
(United States Code, Title 20 1232h)

Protection of pupil rights

1232h
(a) Inspection of instructional materials by parents or guardians
All instructional materials, including teacher’s manuals, films, tapes, or other supplementary material which will be used in connection with any survey, analysis, or evaluation as part of any applicable program shall be available for inspection by the parents or guardians of the children.

 

COPPA

Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act
Section 312.4(d) of the amended Rule identifies the information that must be disclosed in your online privacy policy. While the original Rule required operators to provide extensive categories of information in their online privacy notices, the amended Rule now takes a shorter, more streamlined approach to cover the information collection and use practices most critical to parents. Under the amended Rule, the online notice must state the following three categories of information:
• The name, address, telephone number, and email address of all operators collecting or maintaining personal information through the site or service (or, after listing all such operators, provide the contact information for one that will handle all inquiries from parents);
• A description of what information the operator collects from children, including whether the operator enables children to make their personal information publicly available, how the operator uses such information, and the operator’s disclosure practices for such information; and
• That the parent can review or have deleted the child’s personal information and refuse to permit its further collection or use, and state the procedures for doing so. See 16 C.F.R. § 312.4(d) (“notice on the Web site or online service”).

source: http://business.ftc.gov/documents/0493-Complying-with-COPPA-Frequently-Asked-Questions#Privacy Policies

Student Privacy Matters http://www.studentprivacymatters.org/?page_id=333

sample COPPA opt out form http://meridian.adams12.org/classrooms/201/coppa-opt-out-form

Federal Law-  IDEA

There is a robust set of laws protecting parents and students with disabilities find a nice consist list here and full code is here.

 

Initial evaluation and initial provision of services:

The public agency proposing to conduct an initial evaluation to determine if a child qualifies as a child with a disability under 34 CFR 300.8 must, after providing notice consistent with 34 CFR 300.503 and 300.504, obtain informed consent, consistent with 34 CFR 300.9, from the parent of the child before conducting the evaluation.
[34 CFR 300.300(a)(1)(i)] [20 U.S.C. 1414(a)(1)(D)(i)(I)]

A public agency that is responsible for making FAPE available to a child with a disability must obtain informed consent from the parent of the child before the initial provision of special education and related services to the child.
[34 CFR 300.300(b)(1)] [20 U.S.C. 1414(a)(1)(D)(i)(II)]

Sec. 300.612 Notice to parents.
(a) The SEA must give notice that is adequate to fully inform parents about the requirements of Sec. 300.123, including–
(1) A description of the extent that the notice is given in the native languages of the various population groups in the State;
(2) A description of the children on whom personally identifiable information is maintained, the types of information sought, the methods the State intends to use in gathering the information (including the sources from whom information is gathered), and the uses to be made of the information;
(3) A summary of the policies and procedures that participating agencies must follow regarding storage, disclosure to third parties, retention, and destruction of personally identifiable information; and
(4) A description of all of the rights of parents and children regarding this information, including the rights under FERPA and implementing regulations in 34 CFR part 99.
(b) Before any major identification, location, or evaluation activity, the notice must be published or announced in newspapers or other media, or both, with circulation adequate to notify parents throughout the State of the activity.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(8); 1417(c) )

Sec. 300.322 Parent participation.
(a) Public agency responsibility-general. Each public agency must take steps to ensure that one or both of the parents of a child with a disability are present at each IEP Team meeting or are afforded the opportunity to participate, including–
(1) Notifying parents of the meeting early enough to ensure that they will have an opportunity to attend; and
(2) Scheduling the meeting at a mutually agreed on time and place.
(b) Information provided to parents.
(1) The notice required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must–
(i) Indicate the purpose, time, and location of the meeting and who will be in attendance; and
(ii) Inform the parents of the provisions in Sec. 300.321(a)(6) and (c) (relating to the participation of other individuals on the IEP Team who have knowledge or special expertise about the child), and Sec. 300.321

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794

http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/504faq.html

The implementing regulations for Section 504 as set out in 34 CFR Part 104 provide parents and/
or students with the following rights:
1. Your child has the right to an appropriate education designed to meet his or her individual educational needs as adequately as the needs of non-disabled students. 34 CFR 104.33.
2. Your child has the right to free educational services except for those fees that are imposed on non-disabled students or their parents. Insurers and similar third parties who provide
services not operated by or provided by the recipient are not relieved from an otherwise valid obligation to provide or pay for services provided to a disabled student. 34 CFR
104.33.
3. Your child has a right to participate in an educational setting (academic and nonacademic) with non-disabled students to the maximum extent appropriate to his or her needs. 34
CFR 104.34.
4. Your child has a right to facilities, services, and activities that are comparable to those provided for non-disabled students. 34 CFR 104.34.
5. Your child has a right to an evaluation prior to a Section 504 determination of eligibility. 34CFR 104.35.
6. You have the right to not consent to the school system’s request to evaluate your child. 34CFR 104.35.
7. You have the right to ensure that evaluation procedures, which may include testing, conform to the requirements of 34 CFR 104.35.

Source: Georgia Department of Education, Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent, February 13, 2011

Utah Code

53A-13-301. Application of state and federal law to the administration and operation of public schools — Student information confidentiality standards — Local school board and charter school governing board policies.

(1) An employee, student aide, volunteer, or other agent of the state’s public education system shall protect the privacy of students, their parents, and their families, and support parental involvement in the education of their children through compliance with the protections provided for family and student privacy under Section 53A-13-302 and the Federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and related provisions under 20 U.S.C. 1232g and 1232h, in the administration and operation of all public school programs, regardless of the source of funding.
(2) A local school board or charter school governing board shall enact policies governing the protection of family and student privacy as required by this section.

http://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title53A/Chapter13/53A-13-S109.html?v=C53A-13-S109_2014040320140513

Sources and video: Utah Senator Margaret Dayton addresses the 2014 Agency-Based Education conference on the topic of parent rights in education and the current state of those rights in Utah law. Parental Rights in Education and Utah Law 2014 conference

Utah Code 53A-13-109.

D) the primary responsibility for the education of children within the state resides with their parents or guardians and that the role of state and local governments is to support and assist parents in fulfilling that responsibility;

http://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title53A/Chapter13/53A-13-S109.html?v=C53A-13-S109_2014040320140513

Utah Code 30-5a-103

(1)In accordance with Section 62A-4a-201, it is the public policy of this state that parents retain the fundamental right and duty to exercise primary control over the care, supervision, upbringing, and education of their children. There is a rebuttable presumption that a parent’s decisions are in the child’s best interests.
http://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title30/Chapter5A/30-5a-S103.html?v=C30-5a-S103_1800010118000101

Utah Code 62A-4a-201.

Rights of parents — Children’s rights — Interest and responsibility of state.
(1)(a)Under both the United States Constitution and the constitution of this state, a parent possesses a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of the parent’s children.
http://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title62A/Chapter4A/62A-4a-S201.html?v=C62A-4a-S201_1800010118000101

SB122

Second Substitute Parental Rights in Public Education

Part 15. Parental Rights

31 53A-15-1501. Definitions.
32 As used in this part:
33 (1) “LEA” means a school district, charter school, or the Utah Schools for the Deaf and
34 the Blind.
35 (2) “Reasonably accommodate” means an LEA shall make its best effort to enable a
36 parent or guardian to exercise a parental right specified in Section 53A-15-1503 :
37 (a) without substantial impact to staff and resources, including employee working
38 conditions, safety and supervision on school premises and for school activities, and the
39 efficient allocation of expenditures; and
40 (b) while balancing:
41 (i) the parental rights of parents or guardians;
42 (ii) the educational needs of other students;
43 (iii) the academic and behavioral impacts to a classroom;
44 (iv) a teacher’s workload; and
45 (v) the assurance of the safe and efficient operation of a school.
46 Section 2. Section 53A-15-1502 is enacted to read:
47 53A-15-1502. Annual notice of parental rights.
48 An LEA shall annually notify a parent or guardian of a student enrolled in the LEA of
49 the parent’s or guardian’s rights as specified in this part.
50 Section 3. Section 53A-15-1503 is enacted to read:
51 53A-15-1503. Parental right to academic accommodations.
52 (1) (a) A student’s parent or guardian is the primary person responsible for the
53 education of the student, and the state is in a secondary and supportive role to the parent or
54 guardian. As such, a student’s parent or guardian has the right to reasonable academic
55 accommodations from the student’s LEA as specified in this section.
56 (b) Each accommodation shall be considered on an individual basis and no student

57 shall be considered to a greater or lesser degree than any other student.

58 (c) The parental rights specified in this section do not include all the rights or
59 accommodations that may be available to a student’s parent or guardian as a user of the public
60 education system.
61 (2) An LEA shall reasonably accommodate a parent’s or guardian’s written request to
62 retain a student on grade level based on the student’s academic ability or the student’s social,
63 emotional, or physical maturity.
64 (3) An LEA shall reasonably accommodate a parent’s or guardian’s initial selection of a
65 teacher or request for a change of teacher.
66 (4) An LEA shall reasonably accommodate the request of a student’s parent or guardian
67 to visit and observe any class the student attends.
68 (5) (a) An LEA shall reasonably accommodate a written request of a student’s parent or
69 guardian to excuse the student from attendance for a family event or visit to a health care
70 provider, without obtaining a note from the provider.
86 (9) (a) Upon the written request of a student’s parent or guardian, an LEA shall excuse
87 the student from taking a test that is administered statewide or the National Assessment of
88 Educational Progress.
89 (b) The State Board of Education shall ensure through board rule that neither an LEA
90 nor its employees are negatively impacted through school grading or employee evaluation due
91 to a student not taking a test pursuant to Subsection (9)(a).

http://le.utah.gov/~2014/bills/static/sb0122.html

Opt out of in school vision screening

R384. Health, Disease Control and Prevention, Health Promotion.
Rule R384-201. School-Based Vision Screening for Students in Public Schools.
As in effect on November 1, 2014
(3) Parents/legal guardian of a child have the right not to participate in vision screening due to personal beliefs. All parents must be notified of scheduled vision screenings by the public school to provide an opportunity to opt out of screening for their child utilizing the vision screening exemption form, available at the public school, to document a personally held belief.

http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r384/r384-201.htm

Opt out of Immunizations

R396-100-5. Exemptions.

A parent claiming an exemption to immunization for medical, religious or personal reasons, as allowed by Section 53A-11-302, shall provide to the student’s school or early childhood program the required completed forms. The school or early childhood program shall attach the forms to the student’s USIR.

http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r396/r396-100.htm#T5

 

Fees

R277-407-3. Classes and Activities During the Regular School Day.
A. No fee may be charged in kindergarten through sixth grades for materials, textbooks, supplies, or for any class or regular school day activity, including assemblies and field trips.
R277-407-4. School Activities Outside of the Regular School Day.
A. Fees may be charged, subject to the provisions of Section R277-407-6, in connection with any school-sponsored activity which does not take place during the regular school day, regardless of the age or grade level of the student, if participation is voluntary and does not affect a student’s grade or ability to participate fully in any course taught during the regular school day.

http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r277/r277-407.htm

Homeschooling

Utah Code Title 53A Chapter 11 Section 2
53A-11-102

To educate your child at home, you must submit a signed affidavit to your school district. Although the law doesn’t dictate the time of year, this is usually done during the summer months.  By submitting the affidavit, you are informing the school district that your child will attend a home school and that you assume sole responsibility for your child’s education.

Source: http://www.uhea.org/legal-issues/homeschooling-affidavits#sthash.QGfVPiY5.dpufDual  

Dual Enrollment Homeschooling

R277-438-3. Private and Home School Student Participation in Public School Extracurricular or Co-curricular School Activities.
A. Students exempted from compulsory public school education by the local board for instruction in private or home schools may be eligible for participation in extracurricular or co-curricular public school activities provided they are taking courses comparable to traditional school courses or earning credit under options outlined in R277- 700-6 in at least as many of the designated courses as required by the local board of students for participation in that activity.
B. The private or home school student may only participate in extracurricular or co-curricular school day activities at the school within whose boundaries the student’s custodial parent(s) or legal guardian resides.
C. Dual enrollment students shall be eligible for extracurricular or co-curricular school activities consistent with eligibility standards for fully enrolled traditional public school students, including providing report cards and citizenship information to activity sponsors and coaches upon request.
R277-438-4. Fees for Private and Home School Students.
A. Private and home school students are responsible for student participation fees in the same manner as full-time public school students.
B. Student participation fees for private, charter, online or home school students shall be waived by the school or school district if students are eligible and parents provide required documentation under Section 53A-12- 103 and R277-407, School Fees. The charter or online schools shall be responsible for payment of waived fees to the resident school district.

http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r277/r277-438.htm

Homeschooling affadavits at UHEA

Religious Freedom- Student’s Rights

R277-105-6. Student Expression.
A. A student participating in a classroom discussion, presentation, or assignment, or in a school sponsored activity, shall not be prohibited from expressing personal beliefs of any kind nor be penalized for so doing, unless the conduct:
(1) unreasonably interferes with order or discipline;
(2) threatens the well-being of persons or property; or
(3) violates concepts of civility or propriety appropriate in a school setting.
B. Students may initiate and conduct voluntary religious activities or otherwise exercise their religious freedom on school grounds during discretionary time. Individuals not currently enrolled as students in the school may neither conduct nor regularly attend the activities. School officials may neither conduct nor actively participate in the activities, but may be present as necessary to ensure proper observance of school rules and may limit or prohibit student activities under this section which:
(1) unreasonably interfere with the ability of school officials to maintain order and discipline;
(2) threaten the well-being of persons or property; or
(3) violate concepts of civility or propriety appropriate in a school setting.

http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r277/r277-105.htm

Divider

The Christmas Dragon ~ Movie Review

06 Nov, 2014 by in christmas, fantasy, movie, movie review, movie trailer, utah film Leave a comment

The Christmas Dragon ~ Movie Review

The Christmas Dragon

on November 7, 2014
Genres: Christmas, Fantasy

four-stars




Source: Deseret Book

Medieval Europe - Father Christmas is a fading memory, after Christmas hasn't come for several years.

A young orphan girl, Ayden, receives a magic crystal from a dying elf, with a warning that the North has lost its magic, and that she alone can save Christmas. Ayden and her orphan friends begin a perilous journey, and must escape dragons, goblins, bandits, ogres and other fantasy creatures as they team up with Airk, the wayward son of Father Christmas, to return a stolen Christmas orb to the North. When Santa's magic cannot overpower the growing Snarl (an evil forest with tentacle branches), Ayden and Airk must deliver Christmas on a sleigh pulled by a young dragon, fulfilling Christmas wishes for children to restore Santa's magic and save Christmas.

Tolkein, Father Christmas and a Celtic Music score mixed with dragons? Yep. I went into The Christmas Dragon not knowing at all what to expect, and stepping outside my normal movie genre into the world of midevil fantasy. The Christmas Dragon had a cast of some actors I recognized from other Utah films like Heather Beers (as a nun?) and Adam Johnson (who plays a killer Father Christmas by the way).  A pleasant surprise, I discovered some new actors I now love!

Bailee Michelle Johnson as Ayden– a young girl orphaned after bounty hunters attempt to take her parents, was brilliant. Genuine, complete with spot on accent, she fits the role of dragon whisperer and heroine of Christmas.

I am also team Jake Stormoen and Melanie Stone after last night’s preview at Jordan Commons. Are they a real couple offscreen?

Jake plays Santa’s son turned rogue Captain Jack Sparrow looking elf, and Melanie is a kick butt elfin warrior, Saerwan. These two were far and way the best duo of the film. They are co-starring in the upcoming Mythica, to be released by Arrowstorm Entertainment, which was not even on my radar… until now.

There are a few scary parts and goblin-esque creatures, which would cause me to pause in taking any child under 10 to see the movie, but overall a family film. The Christmas Dragon has a great message about forgivenesss and a prodigal son. An epic fantasy for all ages, just in time for Christmas!

Coming this Friday to theaters and in stores at Deseret Book soon.

Thanks for the sneak peek Excel Entertainment. The crew donated cans to  the Utah Food Bank as apart of the premiere!

See my event photos on instagram the official premeire photos on Facebook.

heather

Cast

Eve Mauro Eve Mauro -Aesa
Talon G. Ackerman- Garret
Michael Flynn- Father Mendel
Adam Johnson – Father Christmas
Bailee Michelle Johnson – Ayden
Jacob Buster – Rand
Paul D. Hunt – Leif
Jake Stormoen – Airk
Dave Bresnahan – Tavern patron
Renny Grames – Gazared

Heather Beers – Sister Lenora
James C. Morris- Old Elf
Melanie Stone – Saerwen
D.L. Walker – Bar Keep
Danny James – Borntall
Andrew Dee Jones – Soldier and Drunk
Ruby Jones- Hoyt
Paris Warner – Rosalynne
David DeVilliers- Fin
Aimee Lynne Johnson – Young Ayden
Cooper Daniel Johnson- Marcus

 

The Trailer

 

Filmakers

John Lyde – Director/Writer/Producer

Jason Faller – Producer

Kynan Griffin – Producer

 

IMDB page * facebook

Divider

An Interview and Giveaway With Author Robert L. Millet

16 Jul, 2012 by in book giveaway, robert l millet 10 comments

I had the rare and amazing opportunity to interview author Robert L. Millet about his newest book Coming to Know Christ in his BYU office last month. In his latest work published July 12, 0212 by Deseret Book, Millet explores what it means to worship.
Tell us what you were hoping to accomplish with Coming to Know Christ and a little about the book:
“As a priesthood leader I saw a lot of anxiety and depression from members of the church who are fixated and focused on right behavior… on the exterior- what shows. Those who worry too much about externals or external measure of righteousness serve a mission, get married and then ask what now? They see these actions as ends instead of means to an end to come to know Christ.  So much more than that we need to come to know God and ask “how’s my character doing? To what extent am I embodying Christlike virtues?” Much of the book deals with these questions: what is worship? Am I coming to know the Lord? It is addressing the Old Testament dilemma found in Matthew 7:23  “And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you.”

I’ve thought a lot about the billboard “Jesus is the answer” What are the questions that Jesus is the answer to? There’s a chapter that addresses that as well as the concept of having accomplished a great deal but not having a transformation of the soul.”
Brother Millet left me pondering my own life and character. His book makes reference to several hymns which influence his life. Since his father was a DJ, so a young Millet spent many hours in the studio with him and was exposed to many types of music. One of his favorite hymns is #221 “Dear To The Heart of The Shepard” about those who wander. Interestingly enough, this is the topic of one of his books When a Child Wanders and he’s currently working on a project for what to do when a parent wanders in response to an email he received from one of his readers. Brother Millet often chooses inspiration for future projects by wandering bookstores (which are his favorite place to be) and asking “what is missing?” “What needs to be written?” He also uses past talks which he saves and files away for future use. Among his favorite new books is The Peacegiver: How Christ Offers to Heal Our Hearts and Homes by James E. Ferrell.
This authors advice to those going through the process of getting published is to allow the editors to do their jobs realizing that many things may need to be changed. When he is finished writing a manuscript he completely walks way for a while and then revisits it with a fresh eye. Brother Millet expressed appreciation for a wonderful editor who is not afraid to speak her mind and offer advice about how to better his written work.
Brother Millet’s motto in life is printed and displayed in his office…the quote, “Preach the gospel at all times; when necessary, use words” which is commonly attributed to St. Francis of Assisi. His hero, his father was an exemplary teacher . “He always made everyone about themselves, he had a way with people. More important than the lesson he taught was the way the people being addressed came away feeling.”
I personally came away feeling edified and uplifted after talking to Professor Millet and know he is walking in his Father’s footsteps. I am grateful for opportunity Deseret Book afforded me to meet and interview him. I finished Coming To Know Christ last night. I would recommend it to all as a guidebook with thoughtful chapters about in refining ones character. He teaches us to do more than profess we are followers of Christ in word. Each of us must show we are Christian in our deeds, in who we are at our core. Brother Millet leaves a reader to ask “what about my character?” “Do I know Him?” and most importantly “does He know me?”
Book Summary from Deseretbook.com: Becoming more like our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ—spiritually more attentive, personally more sensitive, more tender, more gracious—ought to be the desire of every Latter-day Saint. But how can we accomplish that?

In this thoughtful volume and with his warm, accessible style, author Robert L. Millet shares poignant stories and fresh scriptural and doctrinal insights to help us feel our Savior’s love and realize that He stands ready to assist us in coming to know Him.

Brother Millet’s heartwarming reflections on what it means to worship Christ and to trust in Him and in His grace renew in us a desire to stay focused on our Savior through all the ups and downs of daily life. Insights into how much Christ loves us and how He can lift us up to where He is strengthen our commitments to Him.

Throughout, Brother Millet conveys his deep witness of the essential truth that eternal life consists of knowing God and His Only Begotten Son, Jesus Christ.

Coming to Know Christ invites us to experience what it means to know our Lord—not just know about Him but how to come to know Him, our Savior and our Redeemer.
About the Author: Robert L. Millet is Abraham O. Smoot University Professor and professor of ancient scripture at Brigham Young University. He taught with LDS Seminaries and Institutes before joining the BYU faculty in 1983.
Brother Millet has served in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as a bishop, stake president, temple worker, and member of the Church Materials Evaluation Committee. He is a popular speaker and prolific writer whose recent books include talking with God, Men of Valor, Men of Influence, Are We There Yet? and When a Child Wanders. He is a coauthor of the landmark volume LDS Beliefs: A Doctrinal Reference with Camille Fronk Olson, Andrew C. Skinner, and Brent L. Top.
Brother Millet and his wife, Shauna, reside in Orem, Utah. They are the parents of six children and grandparents of ten.
The Giveaway: We have two hardback copies of Coming To Know Christ to giveaway to our U.S. readers courtesy of Deseret Book. To enter to win, simply leave a comment in this post. We will announce the two winners to be randomly drawn from the comments on July 30, 2012.